Linear Mapping - Linear Algebra
Card 1 of 208
A linear map
has a null space that is spanned by the vectors,
and
. is this function 1-to-1?
A linear map has a null space that is spanned by the vectors,
and
. is this function 1-to-1?
Tap to reveal answer
This linear mapping is not 1-to-1. We know this because the null space is spanned by two vectors. Therefore the null space has dimension
. A linear map is 1-to-1 only if it has a null space with dimension zero. This linear map doesn't have a null space of dimension zero, therefore it is not 1-to-1.
This linear mapping is not 1-to-1. We know this because the null space is spanned by two vectors. Therefore the null space has dimension . A linear map is 1-to-1 only if it has a null space with dimension zero. This linear map doesn't have a null space of dimension zero, therefore it is not 1-to-1.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
A linear map
has a rank of 3. Is the linear map,
, 1-to-1?
(Hint- Use the formula
where
is the dimension of the domain
is the dimension of the null space
is the rank of the linear map )
A linear map has a rank of 3. Is the linear map,
, 1-to-1?
(Hint- Use the formula where
is the dimension of the domain
is the dimension of the null space
is the rank of the linear map )
Tap to reveal answer
The answer is no because the dimension of the null space is not zero. This comes from the equation

We know that the domain is
which has dimension of
. Therefore

Also from the problem statement
.
Plugging these into the equation gives



Since the dimension of the null space is
and not
, then the function can't be 1-to-1.
The answer is no because the dimension of the null space is not zero. This comes from the equation
We know that the domain is which has dimension of
. Therefore
Also from the problem statement .
Plugging these into the equation gives
Since the dimension of the null space is and not
, then the function can't be 1-to-1.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
A linear map
has a rank of 4. Is the linear map,
, 1-to-1?
(Hint- Use the formula
where
is the dimension of the domain
is the dimension of the null space
is the rank of the linear map )
A linear map has a rank of 4. Is the linear map,
, 1-to-1?
(Hint- Use the formula where
is the dimension of the domain
is the dimension of the null space
is the rank of the linear map )
Tap to reveal answer
The answer is yes because the dimension of the domain and the rank are equal. This implies that the dimension of the null space is zero.
This comes from the equation

We know that the domain is
which has dimension of
. Therefore

Also from the problem statement
.
Plugging these into the equation gives



Since the dimension of the null space is
then the function is 1-to-1.
Notice that whenever
, then
is always zero. Thus whenever
, the linear mapping is 1-to-1.
The answer is yes because the dimension of the domain and the rank are equal. This implies that the dimension of the null space is zero.
This comes from the equation
We know that the domain is which has dimension of
. Therefore
Also from the problem statement .
Plugging these into the equation gives
Since the dimension of the null space is then the function is 1-to-1.
Notice that whenever , then
is always zero. Thus whenever
, the linear mapping is 1-to-1.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
refers to the set of all functions with domain
and range a subset of
.
Define the transformation
to be

True or false:
is a linear transformation.
refers to the set of all functions with domain
and range a subset of
.
Define the transformation to be
True or false: is a linear transformation.
Tap to reveal answer
For
to be a linear transformation, it must hold that

and

for all
in the domain of
and and for all scalar
.
Let
.
and
, so

By the sum rule for finite sequences,
![T(f)+ T(g)= \sum_{j=1}^{100}[ f'(j) + g'(j)]](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/1000097/gif.latex)
By the derivative sum rule,



The first condition is met.
Let
and
be a scalar.


By the scalar product rule for finite sequences,

By the scalar product rule for derivatives,


The second condition is met.
is a linear transformation.
For to be a linear transformation, it must hold that
and
for all in the domain of
and and for all scalar
.
Let .
and
, so
By the sum rule for finite sequences,
By the derivative sum rule,
The first condition is met.
Let and
be a scalar.
By the scalar product rule for finite sequences,
By the scalar product rule for derivatives,
The second condition is met.
is a linear transformation.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
refers to the set of all functions that are continuous on
.
Define the linear mapping
as follows:

True or false:
is in the kernel of
.
refers to the set of all functions that are continuous on
.
Define the linear mapping as follows:
True or false: is in the kernel of
.
Tap to reveal answer
The kernel of a linear transformation
is the subset of the domain of
that maps into the zero of its range. It follows that
if and only if

To determine whether this is true or false, evaluate the integral:





Therefore,
.
The kernel of a linear transformation is the subset of the domain of
that maps into the zero of its range. It follows that
if and only if
To determine whether this is true or false, evaluate the integral:
Therefore, .
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
refers to the set of all functions that are continuous on
.
Define the linear mapping
as follows:

True or false:
is in the kernel of
.
refers to the set of all functions that are continuous on
.
Define the linear mapping as follows:
True or false: is in the kernel of
.
Tap to reveal answer
The kernel of a linear transformation
is the subset of the domain of
that maps into the zero of its range, so, by definition,
if and only if

To determine whether this is true or false, evaluate the integral:





, so
.
The kernel of a linear transformation is the subset of the domain of
that maps into the zero of its range, so, by definition,
if and only if
To determine whether this is true or false, evaluate the integral:
, so
.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
True or false: If
is a linear mapping, and
is a vector space, then
is a subspace of
.
True or false: If is a linear mapping, and
is a vector space, then
is a subspace of
.
Tap to reveal answer
For example, if
is the space of all vectors in
of the form
, and
is the space of all vectors in
the form
, then
is a linear mapping, but
is not a subset of
, let alone a subspace of
.
For example, if is the space of all vectors in
of the form
, and
is the space of all vectors in
the form
, then
is a linear mapping, but
is not a subset of
, let alone a subspace of
.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
True or false: The identity mapping
, is also considered a linear mapping, regardless of the vector space
.
True or false: The identity mapping , is also considered a linear mapping, regardless of the vector space
.
Tap to reveal answer
Verifying the conditions for a linear mapping, we have
![I[a\mathbf{x}+b]=a\mathbf{x}+b = aI[\mathbf{x}]+b.](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/1009260/gif.latex)
Hence the identity mapping is closed under vector addition and scalar multiplication, and is therefore a linear mapping.
Verifying the conditions for a linear mapping, we have
Hence the identity mapping is closed under vector addition and scalar multiplication, and is therefore a linear mapping.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
is the set of all real polynomials with degree 3 or less.
Define the linear mapping
as follows:

Is this linear mapping one-to-one and onto?
is the set of all real polynomials with degree 3 or less.
Define the linear mapping as follows:
Is this linear mapping one-to-one and onto?
Tap to reveal answer
is a linear mapping of a four-dimensional vector space into a one-dimensional vector space; it cannot be one-to-one.
is onto if, for every element
in its codomain, which here is
, there exists at least one
in the domain
so that
.
For each
, we can choose the constant polynomial
, so each
has at least one domain element that maps into it.
is onto but not one-to-one.
is a linear mapping of a four-dimensional vector space into a one-dimensional vector space; it cannot be one-to-one.
is onto if, for every element
in its codomain, which here is
, there exists at least one
in the domain
so that
.
For each , we can choose the constant polynomial
, so each
has at least one domain element that maps into it.
is onto but not one-to-one.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Isomorphism is an important concept in linear algebra. To be able to tell if a mapping is isomorphic, it is important to be able to know what an isomorphism is.
Let f be a mapping between vector spaces V and W. Then a mapping f is an isomorphism if it is
Isomorphism is an important concept in linear algebra. To be able to tell if a mapping is isomorphic, it is important to be able to know what an isomorphism is.
Let f be a mapping between vector spaces V and W. Then a mapping f is an isomorphism if it is
Tap to reveal answer
An isomorphism is homomorphism (preserves vector addition and scalar multiplcation) that is bijective (both onto and 1-to-1). Therefore an isomorphism is a mapping that is
-
onto
-
1-to-1
-
Preserves vector addition
-
Preserves scalar multiplcation
An isomorphism is homomorphism (preserves vector addition and scalar multiplcation) that is bijective (both onto and 1-to-1). Therefore an isomorphism is a mapping that is
-
onto
-
1-to-1
-
Preserves vector addition
-
Preserves scalar multiplcation
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
That last question dealt with isomorphism. This question is meant to point out the difference between isomorphism and homomorphisms.
A homomorphism is a mapping between vector spaces that
That last question dealt with isomorphism. This question is meant to point out the difference between isomorphism and homomorphisms.
A homomorphism is a mapping between vector spaces that
Tap to reveal answer
By definition a homomorphism is a mapping that preserves vector addition and scalar multiplication.
Compare this to the previous problem. An isomorphism is a homomorphism that is also 1-to-1 and onto. Therefore isomorphism is just a special homomorphism. In other words, every isomorphism is a homomorphism, but not all homomorphisms are an isomorphisms.
By definition a homomorphism is a mapping that preserves vector addition and scalar multiplication.
Compare this to the previous problem. An isomorphism is a homomorphism that is also 1-to-1 and onto. Therefore isomorphism is just a special homomorphism. In other words, every isomorphism is a homomorphism, but not all homomorphisms are an isomorphisms.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Consider the mapping
. Can f be an isomorphism?
(Hint: Think about dimension's role in isomorphism)
Consider the mapping . Can f be an isomorphism?
(Hint: Think about dimension's role in isomorphism)
Tap to reveal answer
No, f, cannot be an isomorphism. This is because
and
have different dimension. Isomorphisms cannot exist between vector spaces of different dimension.
No, f, cannot be an isomorphism. This is because and
have different dimension. Isomorphisms cannot exist between vector spaces of different dimension.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
The last question showed us isomorphisms must be between vector spaces of the same dimension. This question now asks about homomorphisms.
Consider the mapping
. Can f be a homomorphism?
The last question showed us isomorphisms must be between vector spaces of the same dimension. This question now asks about homomorphisms.
Consider the mapping . Can f be a homomorphism?
Tap to reveal answer
The answer is yes. There is no restriction on dimension for homomorphism like there is for isomorphism. Therefore f could be a homomorphism, but it is not guaranteed.
The answer is yes. There is no restriction on dimension for homomorphism like there is for isomorphism. Therefore f could be a homomorphism, but it is not guaranteed.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
In the previous question, we said an isomorphism cannot be between vector spaces of different dimension. But are all homomorphisms between vector spaces of the same dimension an isomorphism?
Consider the homomorphism
. Is f an isomorphism?
In the previous question, we said an isomorphism cannot be between vector spaces of different dimension. But are all homomorphisms between vector spaces of the same dimension an isomorphism?
Consider the homomorphism . Is f an isomorphism?
Tap to reveal answer
The answer is not enough information. The reason is that it could be an isomorphism because it is between vector spaces of the same dimension, but that doesn't mean it is.
For example:
Consider the zero mapping f(x,y)= (0,0).
This mapping is not onto or 1-to-1 because all elements go to the zero vector. Therefore it is not an isomorphism even though it is a mapping between spaces with the same dimension.
Another example:
Consider the identity mapping f(x,y) = (x,y)
This is an isomorphism. It clearly preserves structure and is both onto and 1-to-1.
Thus f could be an isomorphism (example identity map) or it could NOT be an isomorphism ( Example the zero mapping)
The answer is not enough information. The reason is that it could be an isomorphism because it is between vector spaces of the same dimension, but that doesn't mean it is.
For example:
Consider the zero mapping f(x,y)= (0,0).
This mapping is not onto or 1-to-1 because all elements go to the zero vector. Therefore it is not an isomorphism even though it is a mapping between spaces with the same dimension.
Another example:
Consider the identity mapping f(x,y) = (x,y)
This is an isomorphism. It clearly preserves structure and is both onto and 1-to-1.
Thus f could be an isomorphism (example identity map) or it could NOT be an isomorphism ( Example the zero mapping)
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Let f be a homomorphism from
to
. Can f be 1-to-1?
(Hint: look at the dimension of the domain and co-domain)
Let f be a homomorphism from to
. Can f be 1-to-1?
(Hint: look at the dimension of the domain and co-domain)
Tap to reveal answer
No, f can not be 1-to-1. The reason is because the domain has dimension 3 but the co-domain has dimension of 2. A mapping can not be 1-to-1 when the the dimension of the domain is greater than the dimension of the co-domain.
No, f can not be 1-to-1. The reason is because the domain has dimension 3 but the co-domain has dimension of 2. A mapping can not be 1-to-1 when the the dimension of the domain is greater than the dimension of the co-domain.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Often we can get information about a mapping by simply knowing the dimension of the domain and codomain.
Let f be a mapping from
to
. Can f be onto?
(Hint look at the dimension of the domain and codomain)
Often we can get information about a mapping by simply knowing the dimension of the domain and codomain.
Let f be a mapping from to
. Can f be onto?
(Hint look at the dimension of the domain and codomain)
Tap to reveal answer
No, f cannot be onto. The reason is because the dimension of the domain (2) is less than the dimension of the codomain(3).
For a function to be onto, the dimension of the domain must be less than or equal to the dimension of the codomain.
No, f cannot be onto. The reason is because the dimension of the domain (2) is less than the dimension of the codomain(3).
For a function to be onto, the dimension of the domain must be less than or equal to the dimension of the codomain.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
The previous two problems showed how the dimension of the domain and codomain can be used to predict if it is possible for the mapping to be 1-to-1 or onto. Now we'll apply that knowledge to isomorphism.
Let f be a mapping such that
. Also the vector space V has dimension 4 and the vector space W has dimension 8. What property of isomorphism can f NOT satisify.
The previous two problems showed how the dimension of the domain and codomain can be used to predict if it is possible for the mapping to be 1-to-1 or onto. Now we'll apply that knowledge to isomorphism.
Let f be a mapping such that . Also the vector space V has dimension 4 and the vector space W has dimension 8. What property of isomorphism can f NOT satisify.
Tap to reveal answer
f cannot be onto. The reason is because the domain, V, has a dimension less than the dimension of the codomain, W.
f can be 1-to-1 since the dimension of V is less-than-or-equal to the dimension of W. However, just because f can be 1-to-1 based off its dimension does not mean it is guaranteed.
f preserves both vector addition and scalar multiplication because it was stated to be a homomorphism in the problem statemenet. The definition of a homomorphism is a mapping that preserves both vector addition and scalar multiplication.
f cannot be onto. The reason is because the domain, V, has a dimension less than the dimension of the codomain, W.
f can be 1-to-1 since the dimension of V is less-than-or-equal to the dimension of W. However, just because f can be 1-to-1 based off its dimension does not mean it is guaranteed.
f preserves both vector addition and scalar multiplication because it was stated to be a homomorphism in the problem statemenet. The definition of a homomorphism is a mapping that preserves both vector addition and scalar multiplication.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Let f be a mapping such that
where
is the vector space of polynomials up to the
term. (ie polynomials of the form
)
Let f be defined such that 
Is f a homomorphism?
Let f be a mapping such that where
is the vector space of polynomials up to the
term. (ie polynomials of the form
)
Let f be defined such that
Is f a homomorphism?
Tap to reveal answer
f is a homomorphism because it preserves both vector addition and scalar multiplication.
To show this we need to prove both statements
Proof f preserves vector addition
Let u and v be arbitrary vectors in
with the form
and 
Consider
. Applying the definition of f we get

This is the same thing as 
Hence, f preserves vector addition because 
Proof f preserves scalar multiplication
Let u be an arbitrary vector in
with the form
and let k be an arbitrary real constant.
Consider 
This is the same thing we get if we consider 
Hence f preserves scalar multiplication because
for all vectors u and scalars k.
f is a homomorphism because it preserves both vector addition and scalar multiplication.
To show this we need to prove both statements
Proof f preserves vector addition
Let u and v be arbitrary vectors in with the form
and
Consider . Applying the definition of f we get
This is the same thing as
Hence, f preserves vector addition because
Proof f preserves scalar multiplication
Let u be an arbitrary vector in with the form
and let k be an arbitrary real constant.
Consider
This is the same thing we get if we consider
Hence f preserves scalar multiplication because for all vectors u and scalars k.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Let f be a mapping such that
where
is the vector space of polynomials up to the
term. (ie polynomials of the form
)
Let f be defined such that 
Is f an isomorphism?
(Hint: The last problem we showed this particular f is a homomorphism)
Let f be a mapping such that where
is the vector space of polynomials up to the
term. (ie polynomials of the form
)
Let f be defined such that
Is f an isomorphism?
(Hint: The last problem we showed this particular f is a homomorphism)
Tap to reveal answer
f is not onto. This is because not every vector in
is in the image of f. For example, the vector
is not in the image of f. Hence, f is not onto.
We could also see this quicker by looking at the dimension of the domain and codomain. The domain
has dimension 2 and the codomain
has dimension 3. A mapping can't be onto and have a domain with a lower dimension than the codomain.
Finally, we know f preserves vector addition and scalar multiplication because it is a homomorphism.
f is not onto. This is because not every vector in is in the image of f. For example, the vector
is not in the image of f. Hence, f is not onto.
We could also see this quicker by looking at the dimension of the domain and codomain. The domain has dimension 2 and the codomain
has dimension 3. A mapping can't be onto and have a domain with a lower dimension than the codomain.
Finally, we know f preserves vector addition and scalar multiplication because it is a homomorphism.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Let f be a mapping such that 
Let f be defined such that 
Is f 1-to-1 and onto?
Let f be a mapping such that
Let f be defined such that
Is f 1-to-1 and onto?
Tap to reveal answer
f is not 1-to-1 and it is not onto.
f is not onto because all of
is not in the image of f. For example, the vector (1,1) is not in the image of f.
f is not 1-to-1. For example, the vector (1,1) and (1,0) both go to the same vector.
Ie f(1,1) = f(1,0). Therefore f is not 1-to-1.
f is not 1-to-1 and it is not onto.
f is not onto because all of is not in the image of f. For example, the vector (1,1) is not in the image of f.
f is not 1-to-1. For example, the vector (1,1) and (1,0) both go to the same vector.
Ie f(1,1) = f(1,0). Therefore f is not 1-to-1.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →