0%
0 / 11 answered

Writing Standards: Advanced Argument Writing with Counterclaims (CCSS.W.11-12.1) Practice Test

11 Questions
Question
1 / 11
Q1

Policymakers seeking to decarbonize face a choice between carbon taxes and cap-and-trade. A carbon tax is superior because it provides price certainty that encourages firms to invest in cleaner technology, whereas cap-and-trade systems invite gaming and volatile permit markets. Economists often favor taxes for their simplicity, and countries that price carbon seem to reduce emissions without collapsing growth. Critics argue carbon taxes are regressive, but any policy has distributional effects; the political will to recycle revenues can address equity concerns. Moreover, as climate damages accelerate, we should prefer mechanisms that send a clear signal rather than rely on bureaucratic allocation of permits. Opponents also claim that taxes might drive industry abroad, yet globalization is complex and firms adapt. Ultimately, a policy that aligns incentives will perform better than one that distributes compliance tickets. While both approaches aim at the same outcome, it is more coherent to pick the tool that minimizes administrative discretion and embeds long-run certainty into investment decisions.

Which revision most effectively strengthens this argument for a carbon tax by improving evidence quality, logical rigor, counterargument handling, and overall organization for college-level discourse?

Question Navigator