Computation of Derivatives - AP Calculus BC
Card 1 of 790
Tap to reveal answer
In general:
If
,
then 
Derivative rules that will be needed here:
- Taking a derivative on a term, or using the power rule, can be done by doing the following:

- When taking derivatives of sums, evaluate with the sum rule which states that the derivative of the sum is the same as the sum of the derivative of each term:

- Special rule when differentiating an exponential function:
, where k is a constant.
In this problem, 



Put it all together to get 

In general:
If ,
then
Derivative rules that will be needed here:
- Taking a derivative on a term, or using the power rule, can be done by doing the following:
- When taking derivatives of sums, evaluate with the sum rule which states that the derivative of the sum is the same as the sum of the derivative of each term:
- Special rule when differentiating an exponential function:
, where k is a constant.
In this problem,
Put it all together to get
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Find the derivative of the following set of parametric equations:


Find the derivative of the following set of parametric equations:
Tap to reveal answer
We start by taking the derivative of x and y with respect to t, as both of the equations are only in terms of this variable:


The problem asks us to find the derivative of the parametric equations, dy/dx, and we can see from the work below that the dt term is cancelled when we divide dy/dt by dx/dt, leaving us with dy/dx:

So now that we know dx/dt and dy/dt, all we must do to find the derivative of our parametric equations is divide dy/dt by dx/dt:

We start by taking the derivative of x and y with respect to t, as both of the equations are only in terms of this variable:
The problem asks us to find the derivative of the parametric equations, dy/dx, and we can see from the work below that the dt term is cancelled when we divide dy/dt by dx/dt, leaving us with dy/dx:
So now that we know dx/dt and dy/dt, all we must do to find the derivative of our parametric equations is divide dy/dt by dx/dt:
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Find dy/dx by implicit differentiation:

Find dy/dx by implicit differentiation:
Tap to reveal answer
To find dy/dx we must take the derivative of the given function implicitly. Notice the term
will require the use of the Product Rule, because it is a composition of two separate functions multiplied by each other. Every other term in the given function can be derived in a straight-forward manner, but this term tends to mess with many students. Remember to use the Product Rule:
Product Rule: ![\frac{d}{dx}[f(x)g(x)]=f(x)g'(x)+g(x)f'(x)](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/436008/gif.latex)
Now if we take the derivative of each component of the given problem statement:
![3x^2\frac{dx}{dx}+[(x)(\frac{1}{1+y^2}(\frac{dy}{dx}))+(1)(\frac{dx}{dx})(\tan^{-1}(y))]=e^y\frac{dy}{dx}](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/439558/gif.latex)
Notice that anytime we take the derivative of a term with x involved we place a "dx/dx" next to it, but this is equal to "1".
So this now becomes:
![3x^2+[\frac{x}{1+y^2}\frac{dy}{dx}+\tan^{-1}(y)}]=e^y\frac{dy}{dx}](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/439559/gif.latex)
Now if we place all the terms with a "dy/dx" onto one side and factor out we can solved for it:



This is one of the answer choices.
To find dy/dx we must take the derivative of the given function implicitly. Notice the term will require the use of the Product Rule, because it is a composition of two separate functions multiplied by each other. Every other term in the given function can be derived in a straight-forward manner, but this term tends to mess with many students. Remember to use the Product Rule:
Product Rule:
Now if we take the derivative of each component of the given problem statement:
Notice that anytime we take the derivative of a term with x involved we place a "dx/dx" next to it, but this is equal to "1".
So this now becomes:
Now if we place all the terms with a "dy/dx" onto one side and factor out we can solved for it:
This is one of the answer choices.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Find the derivative of the following polar equation:

Find the derivative of the following polar equation:
Tap to reveal answer
Our first step in finding the derivative dy/dx of the polar equation is to find the derivative of r with respect to
. This gives us:

Now that we know dr/d
, we can plug this value into the equation for the derivative of an expression in polar form:

Simplifying the equation, we get our final answer for the derivative of r:

Our first step in finding the derivative dy/dx of the polar equation is to find the derivative of r with respect to . This gives us:
Now that we know dr/d, we can plug this value into the equation for the derivative of an expression in polar form:
Simplifying the equation, we get our final answer for the derivative of r:
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Find dx/dy by implicit differentiation:

Find dx/dy by implicit differentiation:
Tap to reveal answer
To find dx/dy we must take the derivative of the given function implicitly. Notice the term
will require the use of the Product Rule, because it is a composition of two separate functions multiplied by each other. Every other term in the given function can be derived in a straight-forward manner, but this term tends to mess with many students. Remember to use the Product Rule:
Product Rule: ![\frac{d}{dx}[f(x)g(x)]=f(x)g'(x)+g(x)f'(x)](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/436008/gif.latex)
Now if we take the derivative of each component of the given problem statement:
![3x^2\frac{dx}{dy}+[(x)(\frac{1}{1+y^2}(\frac{dy}{dy}))+(1)(\frac{dx}{dy})(\tan^{-1}(y))]=e^y\frac{dy}{dy}](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/439589/gif.latex)
Notice that anytime we take the derivative of a term with y involved we place a "dy/dy" next to it, but this is equal to "1".
So this now becomes:
![3x^2\frac{dx}{dy}+[\frac{x}{1+y^2}+\tan^{-1}(y)\frac{dx}{dy}]=e^y](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/439590/gif.latex)
Now if we place all the terms with a "dx/dy" onto one side and factor out we can solved for it:

![\frac{dx}{dy}[3x^2+\tan^{-1}(y)]=e^y-\frac{x}{1+y^2}](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/439592/gif.latex)

This is one of the answer choices.
To find dx/dy we must take the derivative of the given function implicitly. Notice the term will require the use of the Product Rule, because it is a composition of two separate functions multiplied by each other. Every other term in the given function can be derived in a straight-forward manner, but this term tends to mess with many students. Remember to use the Product Rule:
Product Rule:
Now if we take the derivative of each component of the given problem statement:
Notice that anytime we take the derivative of a term with y involved we place a "dy/dy" next to it, but this is equal to "1".
So this now becomes:
Now if we place all the terms with a "dx/dy" onto one side and factor out we can solved for it:
This is one of the answer choices.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Given that
. We define its gradient as :
![\nabla f =\left[\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_{1}} \cdots \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_{n}}\right]](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/336545/gif.latex)
Let
be given by:

What is the gradient of
?
Given that . We define its gradient as :
Let be given by:
What is the gradient of ?
Tap to reveal answer
By definition, to find the gradient vector , we will have to find the gradient components. We know that the gradient components are that partial derivatives.
We know that in our case we have :

To see this, fix all other variables and assume that you have only
as the only variable.
Now we apply the given defintion , i.e,
![\nabla f =\left[\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_{1}} \cdots \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_{n}}\right]](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/336547/gif.latex)
with :





this gives us the solution .
By definition, to find the gradient vector , we will have to find the gradient components. We know that the gradient components are that partial derivatives.
We know that in our case we have :
To see this, fix all other variables and assume that you have only as the only variable.
Now we apply the given defintion , i.e,
with :
this gives us the solution .
← Didn't Know|Knew It →

Evaluate
.
Evaluate .
Tap to reveal answer
To find
, substitute
and use the chain rule:






![= \pi \cdot 2 x\cdot \left [- \sin \left ( \pi x^{2} ) \right ]](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/177802/gif.latex)

So 
and
![g ' \left ( \frac{1}{2} \right )=-2 \pi\cdot \frac{1}{2} \sin \left [\pi \cdot \left ( \frac{1}{2} \right )^{2} \right ]](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/177805/gif.latex)


To find , substitute
and use the chain rule:
So
and
← Didn't Know|Knew It →

Evaluate
.
Evaluate .
Tap to reveal answer
To find
, substitute
and use the chain rule:











To find , substitute
and use the chain rule:
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Tap to reveal answer
Consider this function a composition of two functions, f(g(x)). In this case, f(x) is ln(x) and g(x) is 3x - 7. The derivative of ln(x) is 1/x, and the derivative of 3x - 7 is 3. The derivative is then
.
Consider this function a composition of two functions, f(g(x)). In this case, f(x) is ln(x) and g(x) is 3x - 7. The derivative of ln(x) is 1/x, and the derivative of 3x - 7 is 3. The derivative is then .
← Didn't Know|Knew It →

Evaluate
.
Evaluate .
Tap to reveal answer
To find
, substitute
and use the chain rule:









Plug in 3:


To find , substitute
and use the chain rule:
Plug in 3:
← Didn't Know|Knew It →

Evaluate
.
Evaluate .
Tap to reveal answer
To find
, substitute
and use the chain rule:







So

and



To find , substitute
and use the chain rule:
So
and
← Didn't Know|Knew It →

Evaluate
.
Evaluate .
Tap to reveal answer
To find
, substitute
and use the chain rule:







So 
and


To find , substitute
and use the chain rule:
So
and
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Use implicit differentiation to find the slope of the tangent line to
at the point
.
Use implicit differentiation to find the slope of the tangent line to at the point
.
Tap to reveal answer
We must take the derivative
because that will give us the slope. On the left side we'll get
, and on the right side we'll get
.
We include the
on the left side because
is a function of
, so its derivative is unknown (hence we are trying to solve for it!).
Now we can factor out a
on the left side to get
and divide by
in order to solve for
.
Doing this gives you
.
We want to find the slope at
, so we can sub in
for
and
.
.
We must take the derivative because that will give us the slope. On the left side we'll get
, and on the right side we'll get
.
We include the on the left side because
is a function of
, so its derivative is unknown (hence we are trying to solve for it!).
Now we can factor out a on the left side to get
and divide by
in order to solve for
.
Doing this gives you
.
We want to find the slope at , so we can sub in
for
and
.
.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Let
.
We define the gradient of as:
![\nabla f =\left[\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_{1}} \cdots \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_{n}}\right]](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/336548/gif.latex)
Let
.
Find the vector gradient.
Let .
We define the gradient of as:
Let .
Find the vector gradient.
Tap to reveal answer
We note first that :

Using the Chain Rule where
is the only variable here.

Using the Chain Rule where
is the only variable here.
Continuing in this fashion we have:

Again using the Chain Rule and assuming that
is the variable and all the others are constant.
Now applying the given definition of the gradient we have the required result.
![[cos(x_{1}+2x_{2}+\cdots nx_{n}) \quad 2cos(x_{1}+2x_{2}+\cdots nx_{n})\quad \cdots\quad ncos(x_{1}+2x_{2}+\cdots nx_{n})\]](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/336312/gif.latex)
We note first that :
Using the Chain Rule where is the only variable here.
Using the Chain Rule where is the only variable here.
Continuing in this fashion we have:
Again using the Chain Rule and assuming that is the variable and all the others are constant.
Now applying the given definition of the gradient we have the required result.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Tap to reveal answer
Consider this function a composition of two functions, f(g(x)). In this case,
and
. According to the chain rule,
. Here,
and
, so the derivative is 
Consider this function a composition of two functions, f(g(x)). In this case, and
. According to the chain rule,
. Here,
and
, so the derivative is
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Tap to reveal answer
According to the chain rule,
. In this case,
and
. The derivative is
.
According to the chain rule, . In this case,
and
. The derivative is
.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Tap to reveal answer
According to the chain rule,
. In this case,
and
. The derivative is 
According to the chain rule, . In this case,
and
. The derivative is
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Tap to reveal answer
According to the chain rule,
. In this case,
and
.
and
.
The derivative is 
According to the chain rule, . In this case,
and
.
and
.
The derivative is
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Tap to reveal answer
According to the chain rule,
. In this case,
and
. Since
and
, the derivative is 
According to the chain rule, . In this case,
and
. Since
and
, the derivative is
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Tap to reveal answer
According to the chain rule,
. In this case,
and
. Since
and
, the derivative is 
According to the chain rule, . In this case,
and
. Since
and
, the derivative is
← Didn't Know|Knew It →