Techniques of antidifferentiation - AP Calculus AB
Card 1 of 1166
A projectile is shot up from a platform
above the ground with a velocity of
. Assume that the only force acting on the projectile is gravity that produces a downward acceleration of
. Find the velocity as a function of
.
A projectile is shot up from a platform above the ground with a velocity of
. Assume that the only force acting on the projectile is gravity that produces a downward acceleration of
. Find the velocity as a function of
.
Tap to reveal answer
with initial conditions 
Separate velocity variables and solve.

Plug in intial conditions

with initial conditions
Separate velocity variables and solve.
Plug in intial conditions
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
A gun sends a bullet straight up with a launch velocity of 220 ft/s. It reaches a height of
after
seconds. What is its velocity 500 ft into the air?
A gun sends a bullet straight up with a launch velocity of 220 ft/s. It reaches a height of after
seconds. What is its velocity 500 ft into the air?
Tap to reveal answer
The bullet will be at a height of 500 ft on the way up and on the way down.
We use the position equation
to solve for how long it will take to reach a height = 500.
and
seconds.
We then plug that into the velocity equation, which is the derivative of the position function.
.
We can see that plugging in the value of
yields
and
yields
. The positive and negative values of velocity indicates the up and down direction of travel.
The bullet will be at a height of 500 ft on the way up and on the way down.
We use the position equation to solve for how long it will take to reach a height = 500.
and
seconds.
We then plug that into the velocity equation, which is the derivative of the position function. .
We can see that plugging in the value of yields
and
yields
. The positive and negative values of velocity indicates the up and down direction of travel.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
The position of a particle as a function of time is given below:

At what values of
does the particle change direction?
The position of a particle as a function of time is given below:
At what values of does the particle change direction?
Tap to reveal answer
In order to find the point at which the particle changes direction, we must determine whenever the velocity of the particle changes sign (from positive to negative, or from negative to positive).
We will need to have the function of the particle's velocity before we can determine where the velocity changes sign. Because the velocity is the derivative of position with respect to time, we can write the function for velocity,
, as follows:
![v(t)=x'(t)=\frac{d}{dx}[\frac{t^{3}}{3}-3t^{2}+8t]=\frac{3t^{2}}{3}-6t+8=t^{2}-6t+8](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/24744/gif.latex)

If we set
, then we can determine the points where it can change sign.



The possible points where
will change signs occur at
. However, we need to check to make sure.
First, we can try a value less than 2, such as 1, and then a value between 2 and 4, such as 3. We will evaluate
at
and
and see if the sign of the velocity changes.


Thus,
is indeed a point where the velocity changes sign (from positive to negative). This means that the particle does in fact change direction at
.
Lastly, we will evaluate the velocity at a value of
larger than 4, such as 5.

The sign of the velocity has switched back to positive, so the particle does indeed change direction at
.
The answer is
and
.
In order to find the point at which the particle changes direction, we must determine whenever the velocity of the particle changes sign (from positive to negative, or from negative to positive).
We will need to have the function of the particle's velocity before we can determine where the velocity changes sign. Because the velocity is the derivative of position with respect to time, we can write the function for velocity, , as follows:
If we set , then we can determine the points where it can change sign.
The possible points where will change signs occur at
. However, we need to check to make sure.
First, we can try a value less than 2, such as 1, and then a value between 2 and 4, such as 3. We will evaluate at
and
and see if the sign of the velocity changes.
Thus, is indeed a point where the velocity changes sign (from positive to negative). This means that the particle does in fact change direction at
.
Lastly, we will evaluate the velocity at a value of larger than 4, such as 5.
The sign of the velocity has switched back to positive, so the particle does indeed change direction at .
The answer is and
.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
A jogger leaves City
at
. His subsequent position, in feet, is given by the function:
,
where
is the time in minutes.
Find the velocity of the jogger at 15 minutes.
A jogger leaves City at
. His subsequent position, in feet, is given by the function:
,
where is the time in minutes.
Find the velocity of the jogger at 15 minutes.
Tap to reveal answer
To find velocity, one has to use the first derivative of
:
.

Note the units have to be ft/min.
To find velocity, one has to use the first derivative of :
.
Note the units have to be ft/min.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
The speed of a car traveling on the highway is given by the following function of time:

Note that

What does this mean?
The speed of a car traveling on the highway is given by the following function of time:
Note that
What does this mean?
Tap to reveal answer
The function
gives you the car's speed at time
. Therefore, the fact that
means that the car's speed is
at time
. This is equivalent to saying that the car is not moving at time
. We have to take the derivative of
to make claims about the acceleration.
The function gives you the car's speed at time
. Therefore, the fact that
means that the car's speed is
at time
. This is equivalent to saying that the car is not moving at time
. We have to take the derivative of
to make claims about the acceleration.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Solve the following integral using substitution:

Solve the following integral using substitution:
Tap to reveal answer
To solve the integral, we have to simplify it by using a variable
to substitute for a variable of
. For this problem, we will let u replace the expression
. Next, we must take the derivative of
. Its derivative is
. Next, solve this equation for
so that we may replace it in the integral. Plug
in place of
and
in place of
into the original integral and simplify. The
in the denominator cancels out the remaining
in the integral, leaving behind a
. We can pull the
out front of the integral. Next, take the anti-derivative of the integrand and replace
with the original expression, adding the constant
to the answer. The specific steps are as follows:
1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
To solve the integral, we have to simplify it by using a variable to substitute for a variable of
. For this problem, we will let u replace the expression
. Next, we must take the derivative of
. Its derivative is
. Next, solve this equation for
so that we may replace it in the integral. Plug
in place of
and
in place of
into the original integral and simplify. The
in the denominator cancels out the remaining
in the integral, leaving behind a
. We can pull the
out front of the integral. Next, take the anti-derivative of the integrand and replace
with the original expression, adding the constant
to the answer. The specific steps are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Find the antiderivative of the following.

Find the antiderivative of the following.
Tap to reveal answer
Follow the following formula to find the antiderivatives of exponential functions:

Thus, the antiderivative of
is
.
Follow the following formula to find the antiderivatives of exponential functions:
Thus, the antiderivative of is
.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Find the antiderivative of the following.

Find the antiderivative of the following.
Tap to reveal answer
is the derivative of
. Thus, the antiderivative of
is
.
is the derivative of
. Thus, the antiderivative of
is
.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Find the antiderivative of the following.

Find the antiderivative of the following.
Tap to reveal answer
is the derivative of
. Thus, the antiderivative of
is
.
is the derivative of
. Thus, the antiderivative of
is
.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Solve the following integral using substitution:

Solve the following integral using substitution:
Tap to reveal answer
To solve the integral, we have to simplify it by using a variable
to substitute for a variable of
. For this problem, we will let u replace the expression
. Next, we must take the derivative of
. Its derivative is
. Next, solve this equation for
so that we may replace it in the integral. Plug
in place of
and
in place of
into the original integral and simplify. The
in the denominator cancels out the remaining
in the integral, leaving behind a
. We can pull the
out front of the integral. Next, take the anti-derivative of the integrand and replace
with the original expression, adding the constant
to the answer. The specific steps are as follows:
1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
To solve the integral, we have to simplify it by using a variable to substitute for a variable of
. For this problem, we will let u replace the expression
. Next, we must take the derivative of
. Its derivative is
. Next, solve this equation for
so that we may replace it in the integral. Plug
in place of
and
in place of
into the original integral and simplify. The
in the denominator cancels out the remaining
in the integral, leaving behind a
. We can pull the
out front of the integral. Next, take the anti-derivative of the integrand and replace
with the original expression, adding the constant
to the answer. The specific steps are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Evaluate the integral

Evaluate the integral
Tap to reveal answer
To evaluate the integral, we use the rules for integration which tell us

Applying to the integral from the problem statement, we get

To evaluate the integral, we use the rules for integration which tell us
Applying to the integral from the problem statement, we get
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Evaluate the following integral

Evaluate the following integral
Tap to reveal answer
To solve the problem, we apply the fact that anti-derivative of
and that 
Taking the anti-derivative of each part independently, we get

Finally, our answer is

To solve the problem, we apply the fact that anti-derivative of and that
Taking the anti-derivative of each part independently, we get
Finally, our answer is
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Evaluate the following integral

Evaluate the following integral
Tap to reveal answer
To evaluate the integral, we use the definition


To evaluate the integral, we use the definition
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Evaluate the following integral

Evaluate the following integral
Tap to reveal answer
To evaluate the integral, we use the fact that the antiderivative of
is
(because
), and the antiderivative of
is
(because
). Using this information, we determine that the integral is

To evaluate the integral, we use the fact that the antiderivative of is
(because
), and the antiderivative of
is
(because
). Using this information, we determine that the integral is
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Calculate the following integral.

Calculate the following integral.
Tap to reveal answer
Calculate the following integral.

To do this problem, we need to recall that integrals are also called antiderivatives. This means that we can calculate integrals by reversing our integration rules.
Thus, we can have the following rules.



Using these rules, we can find our answer:

Will become:

And so our answer is:

Calculate the following integral.
To do this problem, we need to recall that integrals are also called antiderivatives. This means that we can calculate integrals by reversing our integration rules.
Thus, we can have the following rules.
Using these rules, we can find our answer:
Will become:
And so our answer is:
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Calculate the integral in the following expression:

Calculate the integral in the following expression:
Tap to reveal answer
Solving this integral depends on knowledge of exponent rules; mainly, that
. Using this, we can simplify the given expression.

From here, we just follow the power rule, raising the exponent and dividing by it.

Giving us our final answer.
Solving this integral depends on knowledge of exponent rules; mainly, that . Using this, we can simplify the given expression.
From here, we just follow the power rule, raising the exponent and dividing by it.
Giving us our final answer.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Evaluate the integral

Evaluate the integral
Tap to reveal answer
To evaluate the integral, we use the following definition


To evaluate the integral, we use the following definition
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Integrate:

Integrate:
Tap to reveal answer
To evaluate the integral, we can split it into two integrals:

After integrating, we get

where a single constant of integration comes from the sum of the two integration constants from the two individual integrals, added together.
The rules used to integrate are
, 
To evaluate the integral, we can split it into two integrals:
After integrating, we get
where a single constant of integration comes from the sum of the two integration constants from the two individual integrals, added together.
The rules used to integrate are
,
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Solve:

Solve:
Tap to reveal answer
The integral is equal to

and was found using the following rule:

where 
The integral is equal to
and was found using the following rule:
where
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Use a change of variable (aka a u-substitution) to evaluate the integral,

Use a change of variable (aka a u-substitution) to evaluate the integral,
Tap to reveal answer

Integrals such as this are seen very commonly in introductory calculus courses. It is often useful to look for patterns such as the fact that the polynomial under the radical in our example,
, happens to be one order higher than the factor outside the radical,
You know that if you take a derivative of a second order polynomial you will get a first order polynomial, so let's define the variable:
(1)
Now differentiate with respect to
to write the differential for
,
(2)
Looking at equation (2), we can solve for
, to obtain
. Now if we look at the original integral we can rewrite in terms of 

Now proceed with the integration with respect to
.

![= \frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{1}{\frac{1}{2}+1}u^{\frac{1}{2}+1} \right ]+C](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/741662/gif.latex)



Now write the result in terms of
using equation (1), we conclude,

Integrals such as this are seen very commonly in introductory calculus courses. It is often useful to look for patterns such as the fact that the polynomial under the radical in our example, , happens to be one order higher than the factor outside the radical,
You know that if you take a derivative of a second order polynomial you will get a first order polynomial, so let's define the variable:
(1)
Now differentiate with respect to to write the differential for
,
(2)
Looking at equation (2), we can solve for , to obtain
. Now if we look at the original integral we can rewrite in terms of
Now proceed with the integration with respect to .
Now write the result in terms of using equation (1), we conclude,
← Didn't Know|Knew It →